shank2 guinea pig antibody (Synaptic Systems)
Structured Review
![The Gα12/13 pathway is essential for inhibitory synaptic function in hippocampal neurons. ( A ) representative primary hippocampal neuron immunolabeled for Gα13 together with HA-tagged endogenous LPHN3 and the somatodendritic marker MAP2. ( B-D ), colocalization of Gα13 with LPHN1-3 in primary hippocampal neurons. Primary neurons from mouse lines with endogenously tagged LPHN1-3 ( , , ) were colabeled with Gα13, MAP2, and Myc-LPHN1 ( B ), LPHN2-mVenus ( C ), or HA-LPHN3 ( D ). ( E – H ) primary neurons colabeled for Gα13 and Syn1/2 ( E ), vGAT ( F ), <t>SHANK2</t> ( G ), or Homer1 ( H ). MAP2 was used as a somatodendritic marker. ( I ) validation of Gα12/13 KD and rescue system. Primary hippocampal neurons were infected with lentiviruses encoding indicated conditions together with mClover3 as a reporter and immunolabeled for Gα13 and MAP2. ( J – L ) mIPSC recordings from primary hippocampal neurons infected with lentiviruses expressing either Gα12/13 shRNA scramble (Ctl) or Gα12/13 shRNA (KD), together with mClover3. ( J ) representative mIPSC traces. ( K ) cumulative probability plot of interevent intervals and summary graph of the mean mIPSC frequency [ Inset ]. ( L ) cumulative probability plot and summary graph [ Inset ] of mIPSC amplitude measurements. ( M – O ), similar to ( J – L ), except for mEPSC measurements. Numerical data are cumulative histograms or means ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined via Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for cumulative histograms or two-tailed t test for summary graphs using the number of neurons as “n” values (*** P < 0.001; * P < 0.05). SI Appendix , Fig. S4 for colocalization measurements, additional validation of shRNA constructs, and additional electrophysiological parameters.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_0215/pmc11670215/pmc11670215__pnas.2407828121fig02.jpg)
Shank2 Guinea Pig Antibody, supplied by Synaptic Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/shank2 guinea pig antibody/product/Synaptic Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Synaptic Gα12/13 signaling establishes hippocampal PV inhibitory circuits"
Article Title: Synaptic Gα12/13 signaling establishes hippocampal PV inhibitory circuits
Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2407828121
Figure Legend Snippet: The Gα12/13 pathway is essential for inhibitory synaptic function in hippocampal neurons. ( A ) representative primary hippocampal neuron immunolabeled for Gα13 together with HA-tagged endogenous LPHN3 and the somatodendritic marker MAP2. ( B-D ), colocalization of Gα13 with LPHN1-3 in primary hippocampal neurons. Primary neurons from mouse lines with endogenously tagged LPHN1-3 ( , , ) were colabeled with Gα13, MAP2, and Myc-LPHN1 ( B ), LPHN2-mVenus ( C ), or HA-LPHN3 ( D ). ( E – H ) primary neurons colabeled for Gα13 and Syn1/2 ( E ), vGAT ( F ), SHANK2 ( G ), or Homer1 ( H ). MAP2 was used as a somatodendritic marker. ( I ) validation of Gα12/13 KD and rescue system. Primary hippocampal neurons were infected with lentiviruses encoding indicated conditions together with mClover3 as a reporter and immunolabeled for Gα13 and MAP2. ( J – L ) mIPSC recordings from primary hippocampal neurons infected with lentiviruses expressing either Gα12/13 shRNA scramble (Ctl) or Gα12/13 shRNA (KD), together with mClover3. ( J ) representative mIPSC traces. ( K ) cumulative probability plot of interevent intervals and summary graph of the mean mIPSC frequency [ Inset ]. ( L ) cumulative probability plot and summary graph [ Inset ] of mIPSC amplitude measurements. ( M – O ), similar to ( J – L ), except for mEPSC measurements. Numerical data are cumulative histograms or means ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined via Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for cumulative histograms or two-tailed t test for summary graphs using the number of neurons as “n” values (*** P < 0.001; * P < 0.05). SI Appendix , Fig. S4 for colocalization measurements, additional validation of shRNA constructs, and additional electrophysiological parameters.
Techniques Used: Immunolabeling, Marker, Biomarker Discovery, Infection, Expressing, shRNA, Two Tailed Test, Construct
Figure Legend Snippet: Gα12/13 selectively regulates inhibitory synaptic density. ( A and B ) representative images ( A ) and quantifications ( B ) of neurons colabeled for vGAT, Gephyrin, and MAP2 in the indicated experimental conditions. ( C and D ) similar to A and B , except for neurons colabeled with SHANK2, Homer1, and MAP2. ( E and F ) representative spine images ( E ) and summary graphs ( F ) depicting spine density from Gα12 scramble (Ctl) or Gα12 shRNA (KD) conditions. ( G and H ) similar to E and F , except for Gα13 scramble (Ctl) or Gα13 shRNA (KD) conditions. ( I and J ) similar to E and F , except for double Gα12/13 scramble (Ctl) or Gα12/13 shRNA (KD) conditions. ( K ) representative neurons sparsely transfected with Gα12/13 control shRNAs, KD shRNAs, or rescue constructs that coexpress mClover3. ( L ) Sholl analysis of sparsely transfected neurons. Numerical data are means ± SEM from 4 to 5 independent biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined via one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey tests (* P < 0.05), two-tailed t test, or two-way ANOVA in Fig. 6 L . SI Appendix , Fig. S8 for additional morphological parameters.
Techniques Used: shRNA, Transfection, Control, Construct, Two Tailed Test
![Neuroplastin promotes formation of dendritic protrusions. (A–C) Reduced number of dendritic protrusions in Nptn –/– compared to Nptn +/+ mouse primary hippocampal neurons at 9 DIV. (A) Nptn –/– and Nptn +/+ neurons transfected with GFP-encoding plasmids at 6–7 DIV using Lipofectamine. At 9 DIV, neurons were fixed and stained with anti-GFP antibody followed by an Alexa 488-conjugated antibody to enhance their intrinsic fluorescence (green) and with anti-MAP2 antibodies followed by a proper secondary antibody to detect dendrites (magenta). Images were obtained using a confocal microscope. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Protrusion density (number of dendritic protrusions per 10 μm) of GFP-filled Nptn –/– and Nptn +/+ neurons (circles) is expressed as mean ± SEM from three independent cultures. *** p < 0.001 between genotypes using Student‘s t -test ( Nptn +/+ GFP = 4.12 ± 0.18, n = 33; Nptn –/– GFP = 1.72 ± 0.19, n = 36). (C) Protrusion density of GFP-, Np65- GFP-, or Np55-GFP-expressing Nptn –/– neurons from two independent cultures. *** p < 0.001 or ** p < 0.01 vs. Nptn –/– GFP using Student‘s t-test ( Nptn –/– GFP = 1.92 ± 0.22, n = 26; Nptn –/– Np65-GFP = 3.67 ± 0.18, n = 20; Nptn –/– Np55-GFP = 3.77 ± 0.19, n = 26). (D,E) Both neuroplastin isoforms increase dendritic protrusion density in rat neurons at 8 DIV. (D) Confocal images show rat neurons transfected with plasmids encoding GFP, Np65-GFP or Np55-GFP at 7 DIV. At 8 DIV, neurons were fixed and stained with anti-GFP antibody followed by an Alexa 488-conjugated antibody (white). Scale bar = 10 μm (E) Protrusion densities of 40–50 neurons per group (circles) from 3 to 4 independent cultures. *** p < 0.001 vs. GFP transfected cells using Student‘s t -test (GFP = 1.95 ± 0.19, n = 39; Np65-GFP = 3.23 ± 0.14, n = 56; Np55-GFP = 3.58 ± 0.16, n = 38). (F–H) Overexpression of Np65-GFP increases the number of newly formed <t>Shank2-containing</t> dendritic protrusions. (F) Cropped confocal images of dendritic segments of rat neurons transfected with GFP or Np65-GFP at 7 DIV. At 9 DIV, neurons were fixed and stained with primary antibodies against GFP (white) and Shank2 (red). Arrow heads point to Shank2 spots in dendritic protrusions. Scale bar = 10 μm. (G) Protrusion density (GFP = 3.151 ± 0.182, n = 48; Np65-GFP = 4.642 ± 0.145, n = 54) and (H) Distribution of Shank2-positive and Shank2-negative protrusions were calculated as a fraction from n = 40–50 neurons per group from N = 3 independent experiments. Plots display mean ± SEM as indicated. ** p < 0.01 for Np65-GFP vs. GFP using Student‘s t -test [Shank2(+): GFP = 0.54 ± 0.07; Np65-GFP = 0.60 ± 0.06]. (I–K) (I) Size of puncta (area; GFP = 0.10 ± 0.01, n = 747; Np65-GFP = 0.11 ± 0.01, n = 738), (J ) Fluorescence intensity (GFP = 127.6 ± 2.1; Np65-GFP = 131.5 ± 1.9) and (K) Number of Shank2 clusters/protrusion in neurons (GFP = 1.46 ± 0.17, n = 43; Np65-GFP = 1.91 ± 0.18, n = 49) of the experiments displayed in (F) . * p < 0.05 between Np65-GFP-expressing and GFP-expressing neurons using Student‘s t -test. (L) The upper sketch on the left illustrates dendritic protrusions enriched on Shank2 in control GFP-filled hippocampal neurons at 9 DIV. Np65-GFP-expressing neurons (lower sketch) display more spinogenic protrusions with Shank2 clusters.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_5605/pmc07755605/pmc07755605__fcell-08-579513-g003.jpg)